Select Page

Layton City Council (Clint Morris, Tyson Roberts, Bettina Smith Edmonson, and Dave Thomas) Community Betrayal Vote

Layton City Council (Clint Morris, Tyson Roberts, Bettina Smith Edmonson, and Dave Thomas) Community Betrayal Vote

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

Layton City Council Faces “Legalized Bribery” Allegations After Controversial Rezoning Vote

 

LAYTON, UT – June 11, 2025 – A new report from the Consumer Protection Agency of Utah (CFPAU.org) raises urgent concerns about Layton City Council’s Clint Morris, Tyson Roberts, Bettina Smith Edmonson, Dave Thomas recent vote to approve a high-density housing project, despite overwhelming public opposition and serious safety warnings. The June 5, 2025 vote came on the heels of a public offer from the project’s developer to pay for council members’ children’s future education, a gesture widely perceived by residents and watchdog groups as an attempt to improperly influence the council’s decision.

 

The CFPAU report details the 4-1 vote by council members Clint Morris, Tyson Roberts, Bettina Smith Edmonson, and Dave Thomas to greenlight the “Hobbs Creek Villas PRUD” project, rezoning a sensitive, sloped area into high density at 3265 North Hobbs Creek Drive. Residents and safety experts had warned that this change would worsen slope stability, cause draining and parking issues and increase traffic at an already hazardous intersection where UDOT officials have refused to install a traffic signal.

 

A Public Offer Raises Alarms

 

According to public records and video evidence, the developer, Adam Anderson of Goldcrest Homes, publicly offered to fund the future education of council members’ children during a council meeting. While we do not know if any money or benefits were exchanged before the vote, this public gesture—captured on video—has been widely perceived by community members and the CFPAU as a textbook example of what watchdogs call “legalized bribery” and a “pay-to-play” arrangement. The council’s decision to move forward with the project in this context has deeply shaken public trust.

Citizens reported to CFPAU.org that in the Council Meetings related to this proposal that it appeared that the builder/ developer seemed entitled and certain that the Layton City Council would pass his requested high density zoning change.

Several stated that these meetings seemed to have a non-disclosed builder hired area engineer popping up to comment after neighbor comments to discredit their concerns and even humiliate one of them personally to discourage them and other neighborhood residents from expressing their zone change opposition. In addition to those comments, It appeared to them that two of Layton City employee’s were invited by the councilmen to speak and provide highly biased sales pitches in the meeting to promote the passage of the builder’s proposal, while also discounting the community representatives valid safety concern comments.     

 

“Layton City Council members Clint Morris, Tyson Roberts, Bettina Smith Edmonson, Dave Thomas ignored documented safety risks, their own Layton City development General Plan, and the unified voice of their constituents against the high density expensive home development. For them to do so after being publicly offered a valuable gratuity is, in our view, an outrageous breach of public trust,” said a CFPAU spokesperson. “This isn’t just poor governance; it sets a dangerous precedent for every community in Utah.”

 

Pattern of Favoring Developers

 

Although many council members campaigned on promises to keep developers at arm’s length, Layton City Council’s Clint Morris, Tyson Roberts, Bettina Smith Edmonson, Dave Thomas voting records have shown a pattern of favoring developer-driven projects, raising further questions about their commitment to the community’s interests.

 

Legal Loopholes and Public Outcry

 

The Consumer Alert & Warning Report connects the council’s actions to last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Snyder v. United States, which critics argue has created a loophole allowing officials to accept gratuities for past actions. CFPAU.org asserts that this case demonstrates the ruling’s dangerous real-world consequences, with officials now able to accept lucrative rewards for votes that may endanger public safety.

 

Community Impact and Call to Action

 

The developer at https://goldcresthomes.com/ could have built profitable, lower-density housing under existing city zoning. Instead, the approved high-density plan primarily serves to quadruple the developer’s profits at the expense of community safety and neighborhood character. Notably, Goldcrest Homes has confidently advertised the unapproved high-density development as “coming soon” on its website months before the official vote, suggesting the outcome was expected.

 

This report can be viewed at https://cfpau.org/consumer-alert-warning-layton-city-council/ The Consumer Protection Agency of Utah is urging the Utah Attorney General and State Auditor’s Office and others to launch a formal investigation into the circumstances surrounding this Layton City Council approval with the builder/developer’s offer to fund their children’s educations.

 

About the Consumer Protection Agency of Utah (CFPAU.org)

The Consumer Protection Agency of Utah at https://cfpau.org/ is a non-profit watchdog organization dedicated to investigating and exposing potential corruption, consumer fraud, and actions that harm public trust.

About This Site

We are a non-profit organization with the purpose of helping consumers that have been harmed by unethical or illegal actions by Utah companies, licensed professionals and others.

While we are a non-governmental agency, unincorporated nonprofit association, that began 2018. In September of 2020 Kathy Nicholson took over CFPAU.org, with Erica Crawford remaining as Managing Director.

In January of 2022 the CFPAU.org Directors made the wise decision as a nonprofit, that it was best to unincorporate by allowing the registration expire and for it to become an unincorporated nonprofit association.

Since CFPAU.org does not accept any donations and all work is done by volunteers we accept zero financial funding, nor do we provide any funding.

All funds negotiated for refunds or settlements go directly to victims. This is important because we must remain above any influence and remain objective and unbiased in our consumer research and reports. That is why we refuse any payment for our services.

There are no CFPAU financial accounts. We are a unincorporated nonprofit association operated by volunteers, we advocate for consumer victims with state and industry agencies and often meet with state leaders to create better legislation to protect consumers.

We also provide consumer review reports, and opinions about victim experiences  with professionals and companies and organizations that our in depth research has indicated is harmful to consumers. To learn more about our organization, please visit our policy page at https://cfpau.org/policy

 

OUR FACEBOOK PAGE

OUR TWITTER FEED

[fts_twitter twitter_name=CFPAUtah tweets_count=6 cover_photo=yes stats_bar=no show_retweets=no show_replies=no]

Contact Us

E-Mail:

staffservice@cfpau.org